Pedro’s mother would
prepare idlis on alternate Sundays. Pedro hated idlis but his younger brother
loved idlis. As a compromise, Pedro would be ready to eat maximum two idlis but
his brother wanted to eat ten.
Pedro’s mother wants
both her sons to eat the same number of idlis: six each! Surely, both the sons would
be unhappy as they were being forced to accept something ranged against their cravings.
Tanha is a Buddhist concept typically translated as
craving, and is of three types: kama-taṇha
(craving for sensual pleasures), bhava-taṇha (craving for existence), and
vibhava-taṇha (craving for non-existence).
Tanha arises with or exists together with ‘dukkha’ (dissatisfaction,
distress, pain). In the above example, the mother as well as her sons would be
unhappy as they could not fully get what at they want.
But imagine a scenario where everyone adapts to the
situation by breaking the chains of personal cravings. They could sit and eat
together with none forcing the other to eat. Each could eat maybe lesser than
the need and share it with someone who is hungry.
Tanha is not the first cause nor the only cause of dukkha, but it is the principal one. When
we escape the trap of Tanha, we will be liberated of overwhelming cravings and
find satisfaction that comes from aligning to the common good.
Tanha is a trap, don’t let cravings hold you down…
The common good will remove the unhappy frown!
- Pravin K Sabnis
No comments:
Post a Comment