The cartoon is the first thing that most people choose to read in their daily newspaper. Surely it is one of the most important essentials in forming public opinion –- because a visual generally has a greater impact than a sentence does. Hence cartoonists have a bigger influence on the way readers look at various issues.
While Cartoons make us laugh, they are no laughing matter. They have the power to express as well as provoke thinking. The much loved Goan Cartoonist, Alexyz has been doing just that… provoking his readers to think through his caricatures which are accompanied by creative verse.
Seeing Alexyz’s works it is clear that cartooning is not just about a skill. The eventual cartoon is the tip of the iceberg of larger knowledge of the concerned issue. Alexyz is not a distant observer… rather, he is a wandering traveller who connects to his land, environment and people around!
Most importantly, cartooning requires a proactive, positive attitude. We see all that in Alexyz… an ability to discover hope amidst despair, humour amidst sadness, vision amidst darkness… And it is this quality of cartoonists that we need to connect to be better as citizens who seek to be part of the solution to the problems that surround.
- Pravin-da
Monday, July 14, 2008
Monday, July 7, 2008
LITERACY
Just the other day, a friend was showing me an interesting statistic about our state. Goa recorded 82% literacy in the 2001 Census. But the ground reality also reflected a very strange behavioural trait. Nearly 80% (our estimate) of the citizens showed a lack of ability to follow simple instructions. Cars zoom past signposts that restrict speed. No parking boards become pegs for parking vehicles. Spit accumulates under the do-not-spit directive.
This is surely a common civic phenomenon all over India. But surely it is not about the ability to read or the lack of literacy. It is about the attitudinal paradigms which annihilate the ability of the literate. In fact, most such civic signs are graphic enough to be understood even by illiterates. But we literates tend to veer to civic behaviour which we ourselves might find uncivil, offensive or even boorish, when committed by others.
We must examine whether we measure up to the standards of literacy. We must confirm whether our acquisition of the ability to read is underlined by the consecutive learning. Knowing to read, actual reading and appropriate response based on such reading can be totally dissimilar in terms of actual behaviour. To be better it is not enough to be literate, we must use the literacy to good effect. We need to accept the responsibility of being responsive.
The sign-boards before us are literacy tests, after all
Let's BE BETTER at responsive behaviour to walk tall.
cheers
Pravin-da
This is surely a common civic phenomenon all over India. But surely it is not about the ability to read or the lack of literacy. It is about the attitudinal paradigms which annihilate the ability of the literate. In fact, most such civic signs are graphic enough to be understood even by illiterates. But we literates tend to veer to civic behaviour which we ourselves might find uncivil, offensive or even boorish, when committed by others.
We must examine whether we measure up to the standards of literacy. We must confirm whether our acquisition of the ability to read is underlined by the consecutive learning. Knowing to read, actual reading and appropriate response based on such reading can be totally dissimilar in terms of actual behaviour. To be better it is not enough to be literate, we must use the literacy to good effect. We need to accept the responsibility of being responsive.
The sign-boards before us are literacy tests, after all
Let's BE BETTER at responsive behaviour to walk tall.
cheers
Pravin-da
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
